Moral Supervenience and Moral Thinking
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Running Head: RELIGIOSITY AND CONSEQUENTIALIST MORAL THINKING Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking
Religiosity and Consequentialist Moral Thinking 2 Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance towards consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, indepe...
متن کاملMoral Repair and the Moral Saints Problem
This article explores the forms of moral repair that the wrongdoer has to perform in an attempt to make amends for her past wrongdoing, with a focus on the issues of interpersonal moral repair; that is, what a wrongdoer can do to merit her victim‘s forgiveness and achieve reconciliation with her community. The article argues against the very general demands of atonement that amount to an obliga...
متن کاملA Multi-level Model of Moral Thinking Based on Neuroscience and Moral Psychology
Problem Analysis of Moral Thinking⎯First Level The highest level of Marr and Poggio’s model, the computational level of abstract problem analysis, is linked to the notion of moral judgment as the conceptual level model of reason and emotion that makes practical moral decisions. The major models of moral processing by humans would be the computational level of abstract problem analysis as shown ...
متن کاملMoral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry
Actions can be moral or immoral, surely, but can also be prudent or imprudent, rude or polite, sportsmanlike or unsportsmanlike, and so on. The fact that diverse methods of evaluating action exist seems to give rise to a further question: what distinguishes moral evaluation in particular? In this article, my concern is methodological. I argue that any account of the distinctiveness of morality ...
متن کاملMoral Contextualism and Moral Relativism
Moral relativism provides a compelling explanation of linguistic data involving ordinary moral expressions like ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. But it is a very radical view. Because relativism relativizes sentence truth to contexts of assessment it forces us to revise standard linguistic theory. If, however, no competing theory explains all of the evidence, perhaps it is time for a paradigm shift. Howeve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Disputatio
سال: 2000
ISSN: 0873-626X
DOI: 10.2478/disp-2000-0002